Sam Amadi’s statement presents a sharp but nuanced assessment of President Bola Tinubu’s leadership, separating political skill from governance performance. According to Amadi, Tinubu is undeniably adept at navigating Nigeria’s complex political landscape. He credits the president with a high level of strategic intelligence, suggesting that Tinubu understands how power works—when to negotiate, when to apply pressure, and how to build alliances that strengthen his position.
Amadi argues that this political strength is evident in Tinubu’s ability to attract federal legislators and governors into his camp ahead of the 2027 elections. By doing so, the president consolidates influence across key structures that determine electoral success in Nigeria, particularly at the grassroots level where governors play a critical role. This, in Amadi’s view, reflects calculated and effective political maneuvering.
However, the praise is not without criticism. Amadi contrasts Tinubu’s political brilliance with what he describes as weak governance over the past two to three years. He implies that while the president excels in maintaining and expanding power, his performance in delivering tangible improvements for citizens falls short.
The reference to a “bad electoral law” suggests that some of these political gains may come at the expense of democratic fairness, raising concerns about self-serving strategies. Overall, Amadi’s remarks highlight a dual reality: a leader who is highly skilled in politics but whose governance record is viewed as underwhelming. This distinction underscores an ongoing debate in Nigerian politics about whether political success should be measured by strategic dominance or by effective leadership and public impact.
